Why and how does the pray sometimes work?

“Osiris (Jesus, Allah, God, Holly Mother etc.), I know that You are the only one who can throw away from me the sins of the sadness, anger, pride etc., so I ask you from the bottom of my heart to destroy them, because I know – as You say – that they’re not good for my salvation.”

Andrew (Marina, Vasi, John, etc.) says this pray if he feels that he gets angry or sad and if he wants to get rid of the manifestation in himself of these “sins” (as he calls them) which forbids him – he thinks – to “save” himself (to illuminate himself, to awake his conscious etc.).

1. In these moments, the state of anger, sadness etc. diminishes its intensity but it doesn’t disappear totally; plus, it is associated with some slightly doubts regarding the fact that the invoked divinity will really help him to get rid of these states (he doesn’t know if he deserves this favor).

2. When we notice that the intensity of the state decreases, he considers that the divinity has listened to him and thanks Him.

3. The judgments specific to the pray (previously mentioned) are:

- “The anger, the sadness, the debauchery etc. are not good for me because they deter me to fell good (to get the salvation, the happiness).”

- “The Divinity (Osiris …) is the only one who can help me to get rid of these sins and nobody else can’t do it instead.”

- “The Divinity helped me to get rid of sadness, anger, depression etc. – I thank You, Osiris …”




When we have in our psyche some states of anger, sadness etc. the supra-conscious points us out the presence of the wrong judgments specific to them through specific signals of psychical suffering.

Being aware of anger and beginning the pray, we recognize that its not good to get sad, angry etc. (intuitively we realize that these judgments don’t help us to keep our harmony); so we sustain in the psyche a correct judgment and thus the signal of the psychical suffering which signalized the presence of the wrong judgments specific to the anger, sadness etc. disappears.

The formula of the pray contains some correct judgments – that is the anger, the sadness etc. are not good for the keeping of our harmony – which replace the previous ones specific to the anger, sadness etc. (they cease to manifest themselves anymore).

But this formula also contains some wrong judgments pointed out by the presence in the psyche of some anxieties, doubts and by the incapacity of remaining stable in sustaining in our psyche the correct judgments opposed by the anger, sadness etc.



Observation: The pray is accompanied by a more intense psychical suffering specific to the anger, sadness etc. (which usually contains complaints and revolts against the function of some things) are characterized by wrong judgments specific to the anger, the sadness etc. too (to the concrete mental) and by wrong judgments specific to the causative mental which were previously mentioned.

For instance: “Please Osiris, kill all my enemies (crash their heads of some rocks, strike them down, make them sick, punish them etc.), all those people I don’t like (who don’t behave as I want to) because they torture me too …”

These wrong judgments are specific to the causative mental:

- “Only Osiris (Jesus, Allah …) can help me to get rid of anger, sadness etc.”

We have to be deeply aware of the following truth: “nobody can eat instead of us”; similarly nobody can reorganize our cognition on long term instead of us (without our direct or indirect participation).

- “Osiris […] is the only one who can throw away my anger, my sadness, etc.”

The truth is that the wrong judgments specific to the anger disappears only when we realize that they’re wrong (they are not good, useful for the keeping of our own harmony and existence), no matter in who do we think.

The process is easy: our conscious thrown them away, replacing them with some correct judgments opposed to the anger and with some wrong judgments specific to the causative mental.

Only it can do this thing; the motivation for the changing of a wrong judgment specific to the concrete mental with another correct one, specific to the same mental, can be infinite (they can be correct or wrong judgments specific to the causative level).

The supra-conscious “is not interested” in the reason for which we don’t sustain in our psyche a wrong judgment anymore (similarly how the vegetative nervous system, which sends us the signal of psychical pain specific, let’s say, to the case in which we have a knife stabed into our leg, is not interested from what reason do we take the knife out from the leg – if we take it out, the signal of pain decreases in intensity – but it’s interested that we don’t sustain it anymore;

then it ceases to manifest the signals of psychical suffering which pointed out the presence of a certain wrong judgment, but it continues to sustain (if it’s necessary) other specific signals of psychical suffering (states of anxiety, doubts, indecision, obsession, instability etc.) which may point out the presence of wrong judgments specific to, let’s say, the existential – philosophic level.

So the supra-conscious only observes, notices the presence of the absence – in the psyche – of some wrong judgments specific to the different kinds of mental and depending on this, it sends specific signals of suffering (when it notices their presence) or of happiness and harmony (when they are absent).

The motivation that the conscious brings for the change (the throwing away from the psyche) of a wrong judgment specific to a certain level with another one belonging to the same level, doesn’t show any interest for the supra-conscious (it is interested only not to manifest wrong judgments in the psyche anymore).

So when we use wrong judgments specific to the existential – philosophic mental (the doctrines, non-ideals, dogmatic beliefs) and correct ones specific to the concrete mental (for example those opose to the anger, the sadness etc.) the supra-conscious points out the disappearance of the wrong judgments specific to the concrete mental (anger, fear, sadness etc.) - through the disappearance of the signals of psychical suffering specific to them –

but it also points us out the apparition and the manifestation of some wrong judgments specific to the causative mental, through signals of specific psychical suffering (anxiety, doubt, indecision etc.).



“The religious therapy” is half-efficient and limited because, usually, it throws away some wrong judgments using some correct ones (specific to the concrete mental) and other wrong ones (specific to the existential – philosophic mental).

It can’t be considered an efficient therapy because it allows the maintenance in the psyche of some wrong judgments specific to some dogmatic doctrines and non-ideals.

As a conclusion, we see that during the process of pray there are usually included:

- some correct judgments – that the anger, the pride, is not good for us;

- some wrong judgments – the belief that another person can reorganize for us the cognitions in a viable and lasting way.


Example 3: John (Florin, Andrei …) says that he’s absolutely sure that all that is written in the “Egyptian Book of the Dead” (in the Bible, Koran, in the Buddhist writings) is true and must be taken as it is.

He also says that he’s absolutely convinced that what’s written in other books than that previously presented are only lies from the demon Seth (from the Devil) and that’s why he doesn’t read them.

1. When he makes these statements, in his interior there are some anxieties, agitations, doubts etc.

2. The circumstances are those previously described.

3. The judgments are those from above.

4. The wrong judgments implied by those mentioned above are characterized by some false expectations like:

- “I should always be able to adapt myself efficiently to something which is in a continuous change, without being necessary to update the information I have about it.”

- “The social system should always be in harmony, even if I don’t communicate with the other elements (I don’t care about their information).”

- “All that is written in any book, about which the other ones say that it contains only true information, should always be true.”

- “All the others’ testimonies should always be true.”

- “All that I think that’s true should always be true, even if I haven’t checked yet or I can’t check if what I think is true or not (if it has the correspondence with the reality or not).” Etc.